Lecture –11

 

 

 

 

 

Lecture –11

Supply Chain Management

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Topics Covered:

 

·         Meaning of Supply Chain Management

·         Measuring supply chain performance

·         Structural improvement of Supply Chain

·         Improvement in Infrastructure of Supply Chain

·         Virtual Supply Chain

·         Model Questions

 

 

 

 


MEANING OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT

 

Supply chain: The sequence of business processes and information that provides a product or service from suppliers through manufacturing and distribution to the ultimate consumer.

Supply chain management: Planning, design, and control of the flow of information and materials along the supply chain in order to meet customer requirements in an efficient manner, now and in the future.

 

Also, supply chain management is defined here as something different from the supply chain itself. It is important to note that supply chain management requires attention to both information and materials flow. The information feedback loop is critical to effective management of the supply chain. Delays in information can lead to fluctuations in orders and in ineffective movement of materials.

 

A typical supply chain is shown below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MEASURING SUPPLY CHAIN PERFORMANCE

 

Measuring Supply Chain Performance is the first step toward improvement. There are generally four measures of Supply Chain performance, which compare closely to the cost, quality, flexibility, and delivery measures for operations. The specific measures for supply chain performance are as follows:

Delivery. This actually refers to on‑time delivery: the percentage of orders delivered complete and on the date requested by the customer. Note that orders are not counted as delivered on time when only part of the order is filled or when the customer does not get the delivery on the requested date. This is a stringent definition, but it measures performance in getting the entire order to the customer when he or she wanted it.

Quality. A direct measure of quality is customer satisfaction, which can be measured in several ways. First, it can be measured relative to what the customer expected. For example, one company asks its customers, How well did we do in meeting your expectations? Responses are given on a five‑point scale: (5) greatly exceeded expectations, (4) exceeded expectations, (3) met expectations, (2) didn't meet expectations, (1) greatly disappointed. The company wants a high percentage of responses of 4 or 5, indicating that it is exceeding customer expectations. This is, of course, a tough standard.

A measure closely related to quality is customer loyalty. This can be measured by the percentage of customers who are still purchasing the product after having purchased it at least once. Customer loyalty is something that companies are very interested in achieving since it is much more expensive to find a new customer than to keep an existing one. Companies should compare both loyalty and customer satisfaction to that of their competitors; they should also monitor improvement made over time.

Time. The total replenishment time can be computed directly from inventory levels. If we assume there is a constant usage rate from the inventory, then the time in inventory is just the level of inventory divided by the usage rate. For example, if the inventory level is $10 million and we sell (or withdraw) $100,000 per day out of inventory, we have 100 days of inventory. In other words, a product spends 100 days on average from the time it enters inventory until it is withdrawn. The time spent in inventory should be computed for each part of the supply chain (supplier, manufacturer, wholesaler, and retailer) and added to get the total replenishment lead time.

Cost. There are two ways to measure cost. First, a company can measure total delivered cost, including manufacturing, distribution, inventory carrying costs, and accounts receivable carrying costs. Often these separate costs are the responsibility of different managers and are therefore not minimized from a total cost standpoint.

The second way to measure cost along the supply chain is to measure efficiency in value added or productivity. One measure of efficiency is as follows:

 

Efficiency = sales ‑ cost of materials / labor + overhead

 

It is important for management to set goals for these four separate areas of measurement. After constructing these measures, the company must then set goals for those it can control. By doing so, the supply chain can be improved by considerable amounts in most organizations.

 

 

 

 

STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENT OF SUPPLY CHAIN

 

There are five forms of structural change of the supply chain:

 

·         Forward and backward integration.

·         Major process simplification.

·         Changing the configuration of factories, warehouses, or retail locations.

·         Major product redesign.

·         Outsourcing logistics to a third party.

 

Forward and backward integration refers to ownership within the supply chain. If a manufacturer, for example, decides to buy a wholesale firm and distribute its products only through that wholesaler, then the integration is forward toward the market. On the other hand, if the manufacturer buys a supplier company, the integration is backward in the supply chain. If one firm owns the entire supply chain, there is total vertical integration.

 

Major process simplification is used to improve supply chains when the processes are so complex, or hopelessly out of date, that a major change is required. In this case, a clean slate approach is used, where the processes are designed from scratch without regard for the existing processes. This could include major conceptual changes in how business is conducted and major information systems changes.

 

The third way to restructure supply chains is to change the number and configuration of suppliers, factories, warehouses, or retail sites. Sometimes the distribution system is just no longer configured in the right way. For example, many companies have determined that they have too many suppliers and are reducing the number of suppliers by one‑half or more. This is being done to partner with the best suppliers to ensure JIT deliveries and certified sources of material. Another structural change of this type is occurring in Europe as it becomes a more unified market. As a result, companies are finding they need fewer plants and warehouses in different locations. A complete reconfiguration of the production and distribution facilities is underway at many companies.

 

Major product design is often needed to make improvements in the supply chain. Some companies have found that they have too many different product variations and types, some with extremely low sales. As a result, product lines are trimmed and redesigned to be more modular in nature. For example, Hewlett‑Packard found that it had to make many different models of laser printers because of the different power requirements in different countries. To get around this problem, the company decided to have a common laser printer design with a power supply module that could be inserted at the last minute to configure the printer for the particular country where it would be used. This postponement strategy saved the company millions of dollars.

 

Some companies have simply thrown up their hands and decided that the best approach is to outsource all inventory management, distribution, and logistics to a third party. For example, National Semiconductor concentrates on making semiconductors. When the product is produced it is given to Federal Express for inventory or distribution. Fed Ex then warehouses the product, takes incoming orders, and ships the product to the customer.

 

IMPROVEMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE OF SUPPLY CHAIN

 

The objective of infrastructure change is the same as structural change: to remove sources of uncertainty or time from the supply chain. There are five ways this can be done.

  • Cross‑functional teams
  • Partnerships
  • Set‑up time reduction
  • Information systems
  • Cross‑docking

 

The use of cross‑functional teams is pervasive in many businesses today. Their purpose is to provide coordination that is lacking across the various departments and functions of a business. For example, a cross‑functional team is often used to plan and control the master schedule for manufacturing. The team consists of representatives from marketing/ sales, production, human resources, and accounting/ finance. The team develops a forecast of future expected orders, plans the capacity of manufacturing, and schedules customer orders. Everyone then agrees to work toward executing this plan. Without a cross‑functional team of this type, marketing makes a forecast, production uses a different forecast to plan production, and the capital is not made available to provide the capacity needed. Without a crossfunctional team, the functional silos are very effective in destroying any semblance of a master schedule that everyone can implement.

 

Partnerships with suppliers and customers provide coordination across businesses just like cross‑functional teams provide coordination within the business. Partnerships start with a commitment by both firms to establish a long‑term business relationship that will be mutually beneficial. The partners must develop trust for each other to make this work. Also, the partners will probably establish teams of employees from the two different firms to work together on important improvement projects. For example, a new product was developed over several months by a team of engineers from an appliance company and its key customer's site. This team worked very effectively together and made a final presentation to the senior executives from both firms. One executive turned to the other and said, "Which employees are yours and which ones are ours?" The team had become so integrated that it was difficult to tell the members apart.

 

In supply chain improvement it is often necessary to dramatically reduce the setup time of equipment so that smaller lots of the product can be economically produced. Once the lot size is reduced, inventory will also be reduced; the inventory will turn over more quickly, thereby more closely meeting the market need. Reducing setup time requires imagination and can be done for any piece of production equipment by simply getting ready for changeover before the machine is stopped and then making changes quickly once the machine is no longer running so that it can be put back into production as soon as possible. Watching the pit crews work during a road race gives a good idea of how quickly tires can be changed and cars refueled and put back on the track. A similar type of thinking can drastically reduce setup times in manufacturing and service from hours to a matter of minutes. Reducing setup time is one of the changes that can take many days out of the supply chain.

 

Changes to information systems are important in supply chains. One of the changes occurring in industry is obtaining sales data from the final customer and feeding this information back through the supply chain. Suppliers no longer just get orders from their customers; they also know the sales and inventory positions of the customers as well. This gives the supplier a basis for forecasting future orders and planning capacity. Sharing this kind of information is easy once partnerships have been established. However, using the downstream demand information will require improved information systems and new decision rules for capacity planning. These can be integrated into a revised information system.

Cross‑docking is an innovation in transportation attributed to Wal‑Mart. The basic idea is that a supplier's shipments are taken from various docks at the ware­house when they arrive and transferred directly to a Wal‑Mart truck at another dock. The items do not spend time in the warehouse inventory; they are simply moved from one dock to another. This provides the economy of full truckload ship­ments while also drastically reducing warehouse inventory. Cross‑docking is now being widely used wherever there is sufficient volume to make it possible.

 

 

VIRTUAL SUPPLY CHAINS

 

A virtual corporation produces a product or a service without employees or build­ings. It exists to coordinate other companies that do the design, production, and dis­tribution work. The virtual company can quickly form partnerships and then dis­solve them when the need no longer exists. It is a very flexible form of organization that responds quickly to changing conditions.

Suppose that you wish to form a virtual corporation. The first thing you would do is to rent space for your offices, not buy the space. Then you would rent comput­ers and phones to communicate with other companies, and you may hire a few con­tract employees from an employment firm to assist you. To design the product that you plan to produce, you would contract with a design engineering firm, which would suggest alternative product designs and carry the product design through to specifications. You would also hire a contract market research firm to assess the market and make marketing and distribution plans for you. Once the design was finished, you would contract out the manufacturing to one or more of the many firms that do this type of work. Then you would line up manufacturers' representa­tives to sell your product along with other products that they already handle. Fi­nally, you would contract for the transportation, distribution, and warehousing through third‑party distribution firms. Now you have a virtual company. It pro­duces a product or service without facilities or people; it has no fixed assets on the balance sheet. If the company is successful, the return on net assets (RONA), a com­mon measure of financial performance, will be phenomenal.

But is this a good idea? When markets are rapidly changing and the company must adapt quickly, the virtual firm works well. On the other extreme, in a stable market the virtual firm may be too expensive to operate and unable to compete with traditional companies. We have described the extreme case; however, many firms only contract out a portion of their businesses and use traditional employees and assets for their core competencies. Using this approach, they protect their intel­lectual property and their knowledge of technology only in those areas where they plan to create a competitive advantage‑core competency areas.

 

Model Questions:

 

1.    What is the meaning of Supply Chain Management?

2.    How would you measure performance of supply chain?

3.    Describe the forms of structural improvement of Supply Chain.

4.    What are the ways of Improving Infrastructure of Supply Chain? Discuss.

5.    How could you form a Virtual Supply Chain?

 

 

===

No comments:

Post a Comment